Bagging and Boosting with Dynamic Integration of Classifiers
نویسندگان
چکیده
One approach in classification tasks is to use machine learning techniques to derive classifiers using learning instances. The cooperation of several base classifiers as a decision committee has succeeded to reduce classification error. The main current decision committee learning approaches boosting and bagging use resampling with the training set and they can be used with different machine learning techniques which derive base classifiers. Boosting uses a kind of weighted voting and bagging uses equal weight voting as a combining method. Both do not take into account the local aspects that the base classifiers may have inside the problem space. We have proposed a dynamic integration technique to be used with ensembles of classifiers. In this paper, the proposed dynamic integration technique is applied with AdaBoost and bagging. The comparison results using several datasets of the UCI machine learning repository show that boosting and bagging with dynamic integration of classifiers results often better accuracy than boosting and bagging result with their original voting techniques.
منابع مشابه
Improving reservoir rock classification in heterogeneous carbonates using boosting and bagging strategies: A case study of early Triassic carbonates of coastal Fars, south Iran
An accurate reservoir characterization is a crucial task for the development of quantitative geological models and reservoir simulation. In the present research work, a novel view is presented on the reservoir characterization using the advantages of thin section image analysis and intelligent classification algorithms. The proposed methodology comprises three main steps. First, four classes of...
متن کاملDecision Committee Learning with Dynamic Integration of Classifiers
Decision committee learning has demonstrated spectacular success in reducing classification error from learned classifiers. These techniques develop a classifier in the form of a committee of subsidiary classifiers. The combination of outputs is usually performed by majority vote. Voting, however, has a shortcoming. It is unable to take into account local expertise. When a new instance is diffi...
متن کاملCombining Bagging and Boosting
Bagging and boosting are among the most popular resampling ensemble methods that generate and combine a diversity of classifiers using the same learning algorithm for the base-classifiers. Boosting algorithms are considered stronger than bagging on noisefree data. However, there are strong empirical indications that bagging is much more robust than boosting in noisy settings. For this reason, i...
متن کاملThe Role of Combining Rules in Bagging and Boosting
To improve weak classifiers bagging and boosting could be used. These techniques are based on combining classifiers. Usually, a simple majority vote or a weighted majority vote are used as combining rules in bagging and boosting. However, other combining rules such as mean, product and average are possible. In this paper, we study bagging and boosting in Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and t...
متن کاملAn experimental study on diversity for bagging and boosting with linear classifiers
In classifier combination, it is believed that diverse ensembles have a better potential for improvement on the accuracy than nondiverse ensembles. We put this hypothesis to a test for two methods for building the ensembles: Bagging and Boosting, with two linear classifier models: the nearest mean classifier and the pseudo-Fisher linear discriminant classifier. To estimate diversity, we apply n...
متن کامل